I was shocked. I was dumbstruck. I was bombarded with too much cruelty that made me shiver. I have never been exposed to such harsh maltreatment, especially to women. How could they? How could they treat women that way? After everything that they did, I really think that it is indeed appropriate to publish the book, which includes comfort women on it.
I do greatly believe that Fujioka Nobukatsu has been so selfish all along. Is he afraid to tell the world about what his forefathers did to many Asians? He must not! After all, everything is already history. And what is left for them to do, for us to do, is to learn some things out from it. Let it guide us in doing what is right. Just like the words and principles of Supreme Andres Bonifacio. He believes that women should not be treated as animals, but humans. They should be respected, and most especially, be loved. Too bad for Japanese they don’t have someone like Andres Bonifacio, lucky for some of us who knew the truth about him because we can live and follow on his ideals.
I was just wondering about the continuation of the articles entitled ‘War at Home’ and ‘Lola Rosa: Icon and Survivor’ because they seem to be cut. The continuation seems to be lost or not included. "Kasi parang nabitin ako dun eh." But still, it’s ok. The point has been depicted.
I would just like to share my opinion about the first two articles entitled ‘The War At Home’ and ‘Let’s Stop Apologizing’. I kind of agree to the statements yelled by some students in the crowd. "THINK OF THE VICTIMS, STUPID!". " DON’T DISTORT HISTORY!" They really aren’t fascists. They know that what they’re saying is true. They just used their freedom of speech. Those who opposes the publishing of comfort women in books must not steal the rights of the future generations to know the history of their country. They must tell what is true and what has happened. Because if they will hide the thing about comfort women, it’s just another way of depriving children of their right to know. It’s just another way of making the future generations ignorant and biased. Fujioka is saying that if the topic about comfort women will be brought up, children will think that Japan is the a cruel place? I think that’s the part where their job as a teacher intervenes. They must let the students comprehend that it’s just a part of their past, and that all they got to do is to learn from it. I think he’s just being too narrow minded, close minded, and biased. He didn’t even think or even reflect about the things. I wish he’d just open his mind to see a broader perspective of things.
Okay, so I understand his arguments. It's really hard on his part because he's a teacher. Who is the first who gets affected teaching children about the cruel and bloody past of their own country? It's him. It's really hard to feed the students negative things about their country. Who gets affected reading essays of students describing how cruel is their race and how bad their country is. Yeah, it's him. And I'm sure a lot of teachers are also feeling the same way he does. But then again, they must also think about the victims and their families. Who gets affected when a relative was actually sexually abused during the war? Who suffers many days and nights mourning about the loss of their beloved ones due to brutal rapes? Who comforts the mentally-damaged and sexually abused relative? It's their family. The Family. He must think of their families, right? The latter is a more heavier argument rather than his proffession.
If Fujioka wins with his arguments, then the future generations would only end up like us, Filipinos who are very ignorant of the REAL thing that has happened in the past. They would be like most of us who are deprived of the past, deprived of the truth, deprived of knowledge. They will only end up like us who bows to the greatness of Aguinaldo well in fact it’s his greed that killed the real great hero, Bonifacio. It’s just the same, right?
I think the saying "History is written by winners" is indeed true. The most obvious proofs? Take Bonifacio’s situation. Take the comfort women’s situations. They didn’t mention and don’t want to mention about these because they want to maintain their pride for the sake of their so-called ’winners’. Followers of Aguinaldo kept the real history for his sake. Same as the comfort women. Fujioka wants to hide this fact because he’s proud! He doesn’t want to accept facts!
Two Parts I Like Most To React
Lola Rosa : Icon and Survivor.
It was such a brave thing to break silence. It was even braver when you made it first and make others follow your lead. But the bravest of them all is when you publicize a story which, being so dark and shameful, you tried to keep and ignore for a couple of years.
She was indeed an icon and a survivor. Lola Rosa just did the right thing. She laid the first stone which goes all the way to justice- justice for all of them who were sexually enslaved by the captors. As I said, it was a brave thing for her to do such thing, and to think that she did it first. She made the others follow her.
Many may hastily judge her as a prostitute, filthy and crazy woman for doing such. But we must bear in mind that it was against her will. She was raped. She was raped brutally. And we know that it is against the humanitarian law.
Despite her past, it was a good thing for her to move on. Although she didin't actually move on, she just continued her life minus the reminiscing of the past. Yes, she survived. She survived the immoral acts she suffered under the Japanese regime. Yet despite her dark past that still haunts her, she has recovered. She created a life for herself with the people to whom she devotes her life with- her family.
She is an image of a strong woman. I hope we may learn something from her story. And I am also hoping that indeed, justice will be served for them.
From The Depths of Silence: Stories of Survivors.
The story about the rape of Nanking disturbs me the most. I would really like to quote this line depicting immoral acts of the Japanese. "Chinese women were raped in all locations and at all hours." Also this, "Old age was of no concern to the Japanese". I mean, these just show the brutal side of the Japanese. They didn't even respect those great grandmothers and grandmothers. They even included them in their massive rapes. I mean, this only makes me angry. I am a self-confessed feminist, and it really angers me the most when women are not respected. Even the little girls are raped. They still dont even know anything about sex. But still, they are also victims. All the stories by the women only depicts the brutality and madness of the reigning colonialist. What more could I say? Japan indeed has caused many nations a bloody dark past.
Is The Article Still Relevant?
I really think that the article is still relevant. The world needs to know the real thing that has happened in the past. I dont want to deprive the people of their right to know the truth. It is their right to know! Just like my stand on the Bonifacio issue. We don't want to keep the majority ignorant of the truth.
I was also thinking of the families of the victims. This may exploit their family, but we must think that this is one of the effective ways to give them justice. The victims deserve all the apologies and the assistance and justice. What the Japanese has damaged could not be mend, and it will remain instilled in the memories and souls of the victims, which is the most unfortunate part. Actually, apologies wouldn't be enough. But then again, we must also reflect on things equally. We do not live by the eye-for-an-eye law anymore. So forgiveness must also be given to those who really confessed their sins.
Saturday, September 29, 2007
poverty
Where there is colonialism, there is poverty, oppression, and lack of freedom and liberty too.
According to a 2002 National Statistics Office report, during that year 3.4 million Filipinos were unemployed and 4.6 million underemployed. Today it is widely assumed, unofficially, that there are at least 10 million unemployed or underemployed Filipinos. The national debt is hovering around 85% of GDP. And with the price of oil on the rise, poverty in the Philippines is expected to worsen.
I know we're already tired of hearing and talking about this issue again and again. But since we're assigned to tackle our opinion regarding a current issue, I chose poverty not only because I'm affected by it, but because it's regarding reality. I mean, mostly are affected by it, especially now that the prices of commodities are increasing. Poverty is the by-product of other issues such as graft and corruption, lack of job opportunities, education, discipline, etc. It's related to other issues regarding our country in the present. It's also very common, and it's very blatant especially here in Manila. You could just see beggars in the sidewalks and street children asking for alms.. It's indeed a BIG issue.
Looking back during the times when we're under the regime, or should I say, colonialism of the Spaniards, poverty already exists. We knew that the Spaniards took total control on us, which means they totally govern our economy including our resources. I think they didn't just govern our resources, but actually stole it away from us, because that's what the concept of colonialism, right? Good thing if all our resources are given back to us. But it wasn't. Instead, Filipinos at that time were enslaved. We were not given freedom, and worse, we were left to suffer.
The difference is that today, we're given enough freedom. It only depends on us if we let the next generations suffer the same problem that we have.
According to a 2002 National Statistics Office report, during that year 3.4 million Filipinos were unemployed and 4.6 million underemployed. Today it is widely assumed, unofficially, that there are at least 10 million unemployed or underemployed Filipinos. The national debt is hovering around 85% of GDP. And with the price of oil on the rise, poverty in the Philippines is expected to worsen.
I know we're already tired of hearing and talking about this issue again and again. But since we're assigned to tackle our opinion regarding a current issue, I chose poverty not only because I'm affected by it, but because it's regarding reality. I mean, mostly are affected by it, especially now that the prices of commodities are increasing. Poverty is the by-product of other issues such as graft and corruption, lack of job opportunities, education, discipline, etc. It's related to other issues regarding our country in the present. It's also very common, and it's very blatant especially here in Manila. You could just see beggars in the sidewalks and street children asking for alms.. It's indeed a BIG issue.
Looking back during the times when we're under the regime, or should I say, colonialism of the Spaniards, poverty already exists. We knew that the Spaniards took total control on us, which means they totally govern our economy including our resources. I think they didn't just govern our resources, but actually stole it away from us, because that's what the concept of colonialism, right? Good thing if all our resources are given back to us. But it wasn't. Instead, Filipinos at that time were enslaved. We were not given freedom, and worse, we were left to suffer.
The difference is that today, we're given enough freedom. It only depends on us if we let the next generations suffer the same problem that we have.
The descent of Man
Creationism vs. Evolutionism
There are still differences of opinion about the descent of man. In the past, there have been bitter disputes over what doctrines should be taught, especially in public schools.
Today however, we understand that all theories should be given equal weight and taught side-by-side. Accordingly, we will outline the two schools of thought and demonstrate the advantages that result from this evenhanded approach.
Evolutionism
Evolutionists hold that man arose by the same gradual process as other creatures. This belief follows from the principle that the same laws of nature apply to man as to the rest of the physical world.The Evolutionist Model demonstrates how an ancestral "ape-man" could have evolved an upright stance and humanlike physiology. However, it does not explain the tremendous expansion of the intellect and other intangibles that characterize humanity.
Creationism
Creationists, on the other hand, believe that man was created instantaneously by a cosmic powered super-being from another dimension. This belief is based on ancient, heavily retranslated writings taken from badly decomposed fragments of scroll found in a series of caves in the middle-east.The Creationist Model explains the advent of human intelligence by ascribing it to divine fiat in the creation of the first humans, Adam and Eve. A major weakness is that it fails to account for the origin of Adam and Eve's daughters-in-law.
Opinion
When I am asked what's my side to this unending issue on the origin of man, I couldn't possibly answer directly to it. Because I'm torn between the two major ideas-scientifical and religious beliefs. I don't easily believe on things which have no valid proof, which makes me believe on the evolutionism, or the scientific one. But I'm a Christian, so I also believe in God. Therefore, I believe in His words.By doing so, I partly believe that it is He who created man. Got my point?
I say I believe in the scientific origin of man – the famous Theory of Evolution by Charles Darwin. I believe in his theory because he presented and supported his works with facts, facts which are keenly obtained through investigation, experimentation and observation. And we know that a fact is a very good basis. It's a very good pillar to a never-ending argument.
I say I also believe in the religious belief, which states that man is created by a supernatural person – which we call God. The reason for this is that I believe in His words, not just that I'm a christian. And so far, despite the emergence of the theories of some scientists, the religious belief, which is Creationism, is still the strongest basis. It is because the scientifical origin, or the evolutionism, has still some flaws. The missing link has not been found, although there have been studies stating that man indeed came from monkey species. Or should I say, the missing link is still unknown.
I didn't say that creationism is a perfect theory, or belief. It's just that I'm a devoted christian, and I believe in Him, though there are times that I believe more on the evolutionism. I don't know. It's like I believe on two clashing ideas. I took a part from one side, and a part from the other. It just really makes me wonder that the idea presented in my reference is indeed applicable. It says there that why can't we combine the two ideas? The bible failed to mention the wives of Adam and Eve's sons. Maybe their wives were the early hominids, or australopithecus or something. And it is starting from there.
As long as the evolutionism hasn't been totally approved, I'm still going on the creationism side.
There are still differences of opinion about the descent of man. In the past, there have been bitter disputes over what doctrines should be taught, especially in public schools.
Today however, we understand that all theories should be given equal weight and taught side-by-side. Accordingly, we will outline the two schools of thought and demonstrate the advantages that result from this evenhanded approach.
Evolutionism
Evolutionists hold that man arose by the same gradual process as other creatures. This belief follows from the principle that the same laws of nature apply to man as to the rest of the physical world.The Evolutionist Model demonstrates how an ancestral "ape-man" could have evolved an upright stance and humanlike physiology. However, it does not explain the tremendous expansion of the intellect and other intangibles that characterize humanity.
Creationism
Creationists, on the other hand, believe that man was created instantaneously by a cosmic powered super-being from another dimension. This belief is based on ancient, heavily retranslated writings taken from badly decomposed fragments of scroll found in a series of caves in the middle-east.The Creationist Model explains the advent of human intelligence by ascribing it to divine fiat in the creation of the first humans, Adam and Eve. A major weakness is that it fails to account for the origin of Adam and Eve's daughters-in-law.
Opinion
When I am asked what's my side to this unending issue on the origin of man, I couldn't possibly answer directly to it. Because I'm torn between the two major ideas-scientifical and religious beliefs. I don't easily believe on things which have no valid proof, which makes me believe on the evolutionism, or the scientific one. But I'm a Christian, so I also believe in God. Therefore, I believe in His words.By doing so, I partly believe that it is He who created man. Got my point?
I say I believe in the scientific origin of man – the famous Theory of Evolution by Charles Darwin. I believe in his theory because he presented and supported his works with facts, facts which are keenly obtained through investigation, experimentation and observation. And we know that a fact is a very good basis. It's a very good pillar to a never-ending argument.
I say I also believe in the religious belief, which states that man is created by a supernatural person – which we call God. The reason for this is that I believe in His words, not just that I'm a christian. And so far, despite the emergence of the theories of some scientists, the religious belief, which is Creationism, is still the strongest basis. It is because the scientifical origin, or the evolutionism, has still some flaws. The missing link has not been found, although there have been studies stating that man indeed came from monkey species. Or should I say, the missing link is still unknown.
I didn't say that creationism is a perfect theory, or belief. It's just that I'm a devoted christian, and I believe in Him, though there are times that I believe more on the evolutionism. I don't know. It's like I believe on two clashing ideas. I took a part from one side, and a part from the other. It just really makes me wonder that the idea presented in my reference is indeed applicable. It says there that why can't we combine the two ideas? The bible failed to mention the wives of Adam and Eve's sons. Maybe their wives were the early hominids, or australopithecus or something. And it is starting from there.
As long as the evolutionism hasn't been totally approved, I'm still going on the creationism side.
TOFI
It has always been a rule in Physical Education not to exercise in an instant without doing warm-ups. Why? Common sense. Breaking this rule will only result to different muscle cramps and pains, which, as we all know, may produce undesirable effects to our system.
My point here is simple. I'm not a one-sided person. I consider both sides before I air out my opinion. What about TOFI? Well, I'm against it, obviously. I'm against it in the sense that the increase is too high and that it's very unreasonable to have such an increase in an instant. Like, it could have been better if the increase was gradual. I'm not really the right person to hear talking about tuition fee increase because I'm really, really financially-incapable. But, with the sudden alleviation of the prices of commodities, along with the 'pure intentions' of UP to improve the system, I agree with the increase. But as I've written earlier, it's dangerous to haste things up, or to rush things out, because it will only result to undesirable effects to the system.
Want to know some of those 'undesirable effects' I'm talking about? Well, I'm just gonna site my two high school classmates who are both UP passers but didn't get a chance to enroll in the university because of that damn TOFI. Well, UP has just lost two of the best students in the country. And I'm sure they're not the only ones who have that story. I'm sure there are lots of them, unable to enroll because they can't afford. And what's the use of the so-called bracketing system if they can't fully support financially-incapable students like us? They said they have revised that bracketing system, but it only became worse. They've set up certain criteria, but then again they don't follow it. What's going on, UP Administration? What has happened to the so-called premiere University of the Philippines?
My point here is simple. I'm not a one-sided person. I consider both sides before I air out my opinion. What about TOFI? Well, I'm against it, obviously. I'm against it in the sense that the increase is too high and that it's very unreasonable to have such an increase in an instant. Like, it could have been better if the increase was gradual. I'm not really the right person to hear talking about tuition fee increase because I'm really, really financially-incapable. But, with the sudden alleviation of the prices of commodities, along with the 'pure intentions' of UP to improve the system, I agree with the increase. But as I've written earlier, it's dangerous to haste things up, or to rush things out, because it will only result to undesirable effects to the system.
Want to know some of those 'undesirable effects' I'm talking about? Well, I'm just gonna site my two high school classmates who are both UP passers but didn't get a chance to enroll in the university because of that damn TOFI. Well, UP has just lost two of the best students in the country. And I'm sure they're not the only ones who have that story. I'm sure there are lots of them, unable to enroll because they can't afford. And what's the use of the so-called bracketing system if they can't fully support financially-incapable students like us? They said they have revised that bracketing system, but it only became worse. They've set up certain criteria, but then again they don't follow it. What's going on, UP Administration? What has happened to the so-called premiere University of the Philippines?
peeking on someone's mind
i just read my professor's blog and journal. And i suddenly realized that it is indeed very fun peeking into someone's head.
and i was really hoping that somehow, i get a chance to realize that it is indeed very fun to post something substantial in here.
till then.
God bless.
and i was really hoping that somehow, i get a chance to realize that it is indeed very fun to post something substantial in here.
till then.
God bless.
Monday, September 10, 2007
the miseducation of the filipino
this article is written by Renato Constantino. i would just like to share my ideas regarding his write-up.
few comments
The first thing that I would really like to comment about is the choice of vocabulary of the author. The author blatantly has a wide command of the English language. And it’s such a good thing for him. But sometimes not good for me, cause I really have to prepare our mini dictionary on my side in case I’ll encounter an alien word.
On the content, it’s really not a waste of time reading the article. Not only will you learn new vocabulary but also your eyes will be opened to a fact that has long existed in which our eyes are just so blinded to see, because we are just so pre-occupied with the idea that the Americans are totally of help. But then again, we must remember that the world is created with symmetry, that in every evil, there’s goodness, and that in the presence of advantage, there’s a disadvantage.
Education is indeed a very vital factor for one’s development. And as we all know, through education, one’s mind is molded because of the teachings, ideas, and values taught to him. Due to this fact, it’s only either of the two that will happen: the person will become productive provided that he was taught with the right things, or, the person will become otherwise since he acquired negative things. So here comes Renato Constantino, educating us the right way.
I wrote some learning and comments from selected parts of the article. And these are as follows:
Compared to US, our country is still in the process of improvisation or still underdeveloped. Culturally speaking, US has firm tradition or has it’s own culture which was not influenced by other cultures. It has developed freely which sprang from it’s indigenous people. Indeed, US is the master of it’s own house. And provided that we are a corollary of the certain country’s intense desire to spread their seed, we couldn’t deny the fact that we have already adopted some of their cultures and traditions, including their language. American education stresses the importance of internationalism and we simply follow the lead without knowing that our very own foundation of nationalism is weak, making this move disadvantageous. To site is our national virtue of hospitality which, according to the article, has transformed into a stupid vice. (Adoption of Western Values)
Due to the failure of Philippine education, we became so ignorant to the fact that we allowed aliens to strip us of our possessions and wealth. We even praise them for their success, not knowing that some of it is mainly caused by us. They even labeled our country as paradise, but as a matter of fact, Philippines is a heaven just for them but not for some of our countrymen. Because we are still an indirect colony of other countries, many Filipinos fought for complete or total independence and freedom, getting nothing in return but negative thoughts and opposition. Due to colonial education, Filipinos find it hard to grasp the nationalistic principles that must be learned. (Un-Filipino Filipinos)
For a child to master a foreign language, he must first master his own. Because no one is brave enough to advocate the use of our native language as the madium of instruction, the use of English has become dominant. Because a lot are illiterate on this, the use of English as a medium of teaching is an ineffective step, thus producing citizens who do not have mastery of English as well as their native language due to the deliberate neglection to it. Simply put, the masses are becoming more and more illiterate even to their own language. Since many find it hard to use English, many also find it hard to express and lack of expression prevents learning or development of thought, leading to cultural stagnation. (Impediments to Thought)
It is true that we are being dumped with American forms of media. And we can’t deny the fact that mass media is a great factor in molding our character and ideals. It greatly affects our system. Due to this fact, we can’t help but get affected and infected with the whole Americanization thing. And the only way to cure this? Philippine Education. I agree with what is stated that Philippine Education should produce men and women who are not only educated or who do not only know how to read and write and add and subtract, but also men and women who know and who are aware of the present situation of the country and should do something about it for it’s betterment. Philippine education should not only teach the students the basic knowledge and skill but also inculcate within their hearts and minds the values and teachings of our fellow noble countrymen such as Bonifacio and Rizal. Filipino should not only go to school to get a degree or diploma, but should also embed within themselves the values and characteristics that this drowning nation needs. As a saying goes, “Application should always go with education, because the latter is nil in the absence of the former.” (Needed:Filipinos)
*the continuation is in my next posts. :)
few comments
The first thing that I would really like to comment about is the choice of vocabulary of the author. The author blatantly has a wide command of the English language. And it’s such a good thing for him. But sometimes not good for me, cause I really have to prepare our mini dictionary on my side in case I’ll encounter an alien word.
On the content, it’s really not a waste of time reading the article. Not only will you learn new vocabulary but also your eyes will be opened to a fact that has long existed in which our eyes are just so blinded to see, because we are just so pre-occupied with the idea that the Americans are totally of help. But then again, we must remember that the world is created with symmetry, that in every evil, there’s goodness, and that in the presence of advantage, there’s a disadvantage.
Education is indeed a very vital factor for one’s development. And as we all know, through education, one’s mind is molded because of the teachings, ideas, and values taught to him. Due to this fact, it’s only either of the two that will happen: the person will become productive provided that he was taught with the right things, or, the person will become otherwise since he acquired negative things. So here comes Renato Constantino, educating us the right way.
I wrote some learning and comments from selected parts of the article. And these are as follows:
Compared to US, our country is still in the process of improvisation or still underdeveloped. Culturally speaking, US has firm tradition or has it’s own culture which was not influenced by other cultures. It has developed freely which sprang from it’s indigenous people. Indeed, US is the master of it’s own house. And provided that we are a corollary of the certain country’s intense desire to spread their seed, we couldn’t deny the fact that we have already adopted some of their cultures and traditions, including their language. American education stresses the importance of internationalism and we simply follow the lead without knowing that our very own foundation of nationalism is weak, making this move disadvantageous. To site is our national virtue of hospitality which, according to the article, has transformed into a stupid vice. (Adoption of Western Values)
Due to the failure of Philippine education, we became so ignorant to the fact that we allowed aliens to strip us of our possessions and wealth. We even praise them for their success, not knowing that some of it is mainly caused by us. They even labeled our country as paradise, but as a matter of fact, Philippines is a heaven just for them but not for some of our countrymen. Because we are still an indirect colony of other countries, many Filipinos fought for complete or total independence and freedom, getting nothing in return but negative thoughts and opposition. Due to colonial education, Filipinos find it hard to grasp the nationalistic principles that must be learned. (Un-Filipino Filipinos)
For a child to master a foreign language, he must first master his own. Because no one is brave enough to advocate the use of our native language as the madium of instruction, the use of English has become dominant. Because a lot are illiterate on this, the use of English as a medium of teaching is an ineffective step, thus producing citizens who do not have mastery of English as well as their native language due to the deliberate neglection to it. Simply put, the masses are becoming more and more illiterate even to their own language. Since many find it hard to use English, many also find it hard to express and lack of expression prevents learning or development of thought, leading to cultural stagnation. (Impediments to Thought)
It is true that we are being dumped with American forms of media. And we can’t deny the fact that mass media is a great factor in molding our character and ideals. It greatly affects our system. Due to this fact, we can’t help but get affected and infected with the whole Americanization thing. And the only way to cure this? Philippine Education. I agree with what is stated that Philippine Education should produce men and women who are not only educated or who do not only know how to read and write and add and subtract, but also men and women who know and who are aware of the present situation of the country and should do something about it for it’s betterment. Philippine education should not only teach the students the basic knowledge and skill but also inculcate within their hearts and minds the values and teachings of our fellow noble countrymen such as Bonifacio and Rizal. Filipino should not only go to school to get a degree or diploma, but should also embed within themselves the values and characteristics that this drowning nation needs. As a saying goes, “Application should always go with education, because the latter is nil in the absence of the former.” (Needed:Filipinos)
*the continuation is in my next posts. :)
Friday, September 7, 2007
i busted big time. just this morning, the results of the first two parts of the exam in math17 are already given. i didn't expect much since it was indeed pretty hard. no. not pretty. it was actually VERY hard. but then again, it's based on my point of view.
i only got 22 out of 40. that's still the true or false test and the multiple choice. my, i was so shocked to see other scores such as 32 36 and gosh, 38. now that made me wonder. is it me? or im just really too stupid?
that made me depress, actually.
now, i can't think of anything to write. i was really hoping i could be a man of sense. especially now that i am starting to read. i mean, im starting to bring back my old habit of reading.
i was also hpoing that this blog would prosper. here we go again.
but then again, i hope i could write a lot by next time God bless.
i only got 22 out of 40. that's still the true or false test and the multiple choice. my, i was so shocked to see other scores such as 32 36 and gosh, 38. now that made me wonder. is it me? or im just really too stupid?
that made me depress, actually.
now, i can't think of anything to write. i was really hoping i could be a man of sense. especially now that i am starting to read. i mean, im starting to bring back my old habit of reading.
i was also hpoing that this blog would prosper. here we go again.
but then again, i hope i could write a lot by next time God bless.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
